Magnum Issues

Bret's avatar

MDOmnis said:

They've also done away with the ridiculous procedure to wait until the platform is clear before locking the lapbars (they were doing this to start the season).

Haven't been up to the park in about a month. Is this the case just on Magnum or have they quit this stupid procedure on everything else as well? It was absolutely killing GateKeeper's capacity early in the season.

I didn't ride GK this trip, but based on observing dispatch intervals at GK from the midway here and there, I'm guessing they did away with it there as well. I noticed last trip they had either done away with it at Raptor or were ignoring the "rule" because they were fairly close to efficient.


-Matt

Thabto's avatar

I think they did away with the procedure entirely. I didn't notice too much stacking on Gatekeeper last time I was there and I don't see much stacking of all 3 trains on Rougarou.


Brian
Valravn Rides: 24| Steel Vengeance Rides: 27| Dragster Rollbacks: 1

Do you think cp would ever think about getting rid of Magnum?

Thabto's avatar

Not anytime in the forseeable future.


Brian
Valravn Rides: 24| Steel Vengeance Rides: 27| Dragster Rollbacks: 1

Or ever.

gskins17 said:

Do you think cp would ever think about getting rid of Magnum?

I wouldn't say ever. All rides have a finate lifespan. Even steel coasters. However, not any time soon.

With that said, I would actually love to see Magnum replaced. I know I'm in the very small population of Magnum haters but I just don't enjoy the ride anymore.

CoasterKyle1121's avatar

I would be be heartbroken. Magnum is one of my favorite rides.


1999: First visit
Halloweekends- Harvest Fear, Tombstone Terror-Tory
Ride Operations- Professor Delbert’s Frontier Fling

It's weird to think about when they would ever take MF out. It's pretty much the number one attraction but in the next 20 or so years, will it still be as popular? (and no I am not saying MF is going anywhere in 20 years, but just a thought)

Last edited by CPboy77,

I do love Magnum, a fun ride and usually no lines. But boy it sure has gotten rough lately!

I don't think Magnum will get removed anytime soon, but if they were to change anything my vote would be for updated trains. Those bad boys are a pain to get in and out of and the back rests don't do any favors for me in the pretzel. The look of them is still very cool, but the feeling not so much.

I would actually like to see magnum re-tracked. Same basic layout with smoother modern track and trains.

Gatekeeper2013's avatar

Besides cost, and many other factors that make that idea virtually impossible, I think the biggest obstacle would be the fact that the company that built it is out of business.

CoasterKyle1121's avatar

Magnum being retracked would honestly upset me.


1999: First visit
Halloweekends- Harvest Fear, Tombstone Terror-Tory
Ride Operations- Professor Delbert’s Frontier Fling

Chubz's avatar

Personally I prefer Magnum over say Diamondback. I think that coaster is too iconic for CP to let it go anytime soon. But there is no denying that even on a busy day that line is short.


This season - CP visits: 9 KI visits: 2 Total Rides: 217

noggin's avatar

Eventually, all of the coasters we enjoy now at Cedar Point will be removed.

The Cedar Point Cyclone, High Frolics, Super Coaster and Broadway Trip are all long gone....


I'm a Marxist, of the Groucho sort.

Pete's avatar

RideMan said:

A prox switch is still just a switch. Get a metal target close enough to it, and it closes or opens.

Thanks Dave, I never knew that. I just assumed a prox switch just signaled a computer by going high or low but didn't actually act like a mechanical switch.


I'd rather be in my boat with a drink on the rocks,
than in the drink with a boat on the rocks.

Gatekeeper2013 said:

Besides cost, and many other factors that make that idea virtually impossible, I think the biggest obstacle would be the fact that the company that built it is out of business.

https://www.chancerides.com/ would be up to the task. it's certainly not impossible, they've done it before.

Pete: a prox does signal a computer by going high or low. But if you look at a PLC, the digital input cards are typically rigged to take a contact closure. The prox switches are designed to provide that. Unlike a mechanical switch, the proxes need power to drive the induction loop, but electrically they work more or less the same way.

Oh, and I have learned that Corkscrew does have an updated PLC running it. :)

--Dave Althoff, Jr.



/X\ *** Respect rides. They do not respect you. ***
/XXX\ /X\ /X\_ _ /X\__ _ _____
/XXXXX\ /XXX\ /XXXX\_ /X\ /XXXXX\ /X\ /XXXXX
_/XXXXXXX\_/XXXXX\_/XXXXXXX\_/XXX\_/XXXXXXX\__/XXX\__/XXXXXX

thedevariouseffect's avatar

^I was about to talk about that haha.

It didn't have a PLC to start, it was originally all relay logic & hard wiring Later one was brought in and limit switches and photo eyes were eventually removed. Then photoeyes were added in later for extra block safety checks. Then a second safety PLC was added.

It still has a pedal counter, and is tested daily on all trains cycling for the day.

The ride does control itself. Other than us releasing brakes and moving things when needed as dictated by SOP, it does it all while we watch and make sure it safely runs.

Last edited by thedevariouseffect,

Corkscrew, Power Tower, Magnum, & Monster/ Witches Wheel Crew 2011

You must be logged in to post

POP Forums app ©2024, POP World Media, LLC - Terms of Service